FLCH vs. RYCEY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.30%/yr vs 68.92%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 15.83% return.

FLCH

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: -12.52%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 1Y: -3.28%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.20%

RYCEY

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -3.36%
• 6M: 4.11%
• YTD: 15.83%
• 1Y: 33.75%
• 3Y*: 111.25%
• 5Y*: 68.92%
• 10Y*: 7.64%
• ALL TIME*: -11.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-9.29%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	15.83%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-12.69%	-7.35%	-10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and RYCEY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.28

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 73
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCH	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	0.88	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	1.50	-1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.18	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	1.56	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	4.32	-4.66

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and RYCEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	RYCEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-99.07%	+36.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.48%	-21.75%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-23.37%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.45%	-62.01%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.06%	-77.01%	+40.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.61%	-84.09%	+53.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.77%	7.83%	+1.94%

Volatility

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.16%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	RYCEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	8.23%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.05%	33.05%	-19.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.88%	38.40%	-18.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.62%	43.23%	-13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.82%	49.27%	-21.45%

Dividends

FLCH vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than RYCEY's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.39%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.70%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and RYCEY in my portfolio?

FLCH and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or RYCEY?

RYCEY has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to FLCH (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.