FLCC vs. VOTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FLCC is actively managed, while VOTE is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 18.08% vs 23.56% for VOTE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.

Performance

FLCC vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than VOTE's 8.18% return.

FLCC

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 6.07%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: 18.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOTE

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 23.56%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	6.07%	16.61%	9.68%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	8.18%	17.95%	9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and VOTE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.95

The correlation between FLCC and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCC vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCC	VOTE
Technology	39.3%	39.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	9.9%
Financial Services	10.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	9.6%	8.3%
Communication Services	9.3%	10.7%
Industrials	8.9%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	4.4%
Energy	2.5%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.7%
Utilities	1.4%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.7%

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 43
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 49

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCC	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.85	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.53	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.60	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	11.48	-3.84

FLCC vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and VOTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	VOTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-25.71%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-9.10%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.46%	-3.25%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-6.10%	+3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.06%	+0.31%

Volatility

FLCC vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is 4.57%, while Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that FLCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	VOTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.98%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	10.14%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.13%	12.79%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.19%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.18%	+0.21%

FLCC vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than VOTE's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	0.70%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and VOTE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FLCC and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLCC or VOTE?

VOTE has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FLCC (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or VOTE?

On 1-year performance, VOTE leads with 23.56% vs 18.08% for FLCC. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FLCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCC or VOTE?

Over the 1-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 23.56% return vs 18.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or VOTE?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or VOTE?

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.48% for FLCC.

What is the main difference between FLCC and VOTE?

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 0.05% for VOTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.