FLCC vs. DMAY
FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FLCC is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 23.52% vs 18.75% for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
FLCC vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than DMAY's 1.69% return.
FLCC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 23.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCC vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF | -1.10% | 16.61% | 9.94% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 1.69% | 11.05% | 5.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCC and DMAY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FLCC and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 — a consistent structural relationship.
FLCC vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCC vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
FLCC
DMAY
FLCC vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 2.53 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 3.90 | -1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.64 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 4.44 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 26.94 | -12.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.53 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.83 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
FLCC vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and DMAY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.18% | -13.90% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -3.67% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | 0.00% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -2.30% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 0.74% | +1.61% |
Volatility
FLCC vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 3.05%. This indicates that FLCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCC | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 3.05% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 4.12% | +6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 9.34% | +7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 9.02% | +8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 8.53% | +9.33% |
Dividends
FLCC vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF | 0.51% | 0.50% | 0.20% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |