PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCC vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCC vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than DMAY's 1.69% return.


FLCC

1D
0.40%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
1.02%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAY

1D
0.39%
1M
1.42%
YTD
1.69%
6M
3.54%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
-1.10%16.61%9.94%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
1.69%11.05%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and DMAY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.92

The correlation between FLCC and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 — a consistent structural relationship.

FLCC vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCC vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC
FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCCDMAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

2.53

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

3.90

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.64

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.44

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.20

26.94

-12.74

FLCC vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCCDMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.53

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and DMAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCCDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-13.90%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-3.67%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

0.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-2.30%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

0.74%

+1.61%

Volatility

FLCC vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 3.05%. This indicates that FLCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLCCDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

3.05%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

4.12%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

9.34%

+7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

9.02%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

8.53%

+9.33%

Dividends

FLCC vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.