FLCC vs. FLCG

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG).

FLCC and FLCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCC is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. FLCG is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024.

Performance

FLCC vs. FLCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLCC vs. FLCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	-4.24%	16.61%	9.94%
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	-8.68%	16.87%	12.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a -4.24% return, which is significantly higher than FLCG's -8.68% return.

FLCC

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: -4.24%
• 6M: -2.76%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCG

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -3.61%
• YTD: -8.68%
• 6M: -7.91%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. FLCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCG's 0.39% expense ratio.

FLCG

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF

FLCC

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. FLCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 38
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FLCG

FLCG Risk / Return Rank: 33
FLCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FLCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FLCG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FLCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLCG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. FLCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCC	FLCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.66	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.16	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	1.08	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	3.55	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCC vs. FLCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the FLCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and FLCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCC	FLCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	0.66	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.55	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and FLCG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FLCC vs. FLCG - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than FLCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.20%
FLCG Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. FLCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum FLCG drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and FLCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	FLCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-22.95%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-15.07%	+5.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.88%	-10.94%	+5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-3.76%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	4.56%	-1.58%

Volatility

FLCC vs. FLCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is 5.42%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that FLCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	FLCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	6.67%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	12.27%	-1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.25%	22.76%	-3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.86%	21.65%	-3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	21.65%	-3.79%