FLCC vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 16.53% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

FLCC

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: 7.70%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 1Y: 16.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	9.53%	16.61%	6.90%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and MSTZ is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.45

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 45
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCC	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.92	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.45	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	3.35	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.88	6.53	+0.35

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-99.38%	+80.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-84.89%	+75.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-97.39%	+96.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.33%	-94.53%	+92.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	43.51%	-41.10%

Volatility

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is 3.37%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that FLCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	56.56%	-53.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	135.11%	-124.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	148.53%	-135.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	171.02%	-153.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	171.02%	-153.81%

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and MSTZ in my portfolio?

FLCC and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCC or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to FLCC (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 16.53% for FLCC. On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLCC has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCC or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 16.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or MSTZ?

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or MSTZ?

FLCC has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between FLCC and MSTZ?

FLCC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.