PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCC vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.97% return.


FLCC

1D
-1.13%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
6.07%
6M
5.10%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
20.97%
6M
19.74%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and FTIF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024

0.58

The correlation between FLCC and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCC vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCC
FTIF

Technology

39.3%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
4.0%

Financial Services

10.1%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Communication Services

9.3%

-

Industrials

8.9%
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Energy

2.5%
38.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
22.0%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Real Estate

1.2%
14.0%

Technology

FLCC
39.3%
FTIF
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCC
12.4%
FTIF
4.0%

Financial Services

FLCC
10.1%
FTIF

-

Healthcare

FLCC
9.6%
FTIF

-

Communication Services

FLCC
9.3%
FTIF

-

Industrials

FLCC
8.9%
FTIF
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLCC
3.4%
FTIF

-

Energy

FLCC
2.5%
FTIF
38.0%

Basic Materials

FLCC
2.0%
FTIF
22.0%

Utilities

FLCC
1.4%
FTIF

-

Real Estate

FLCC
1.2%
FTIF
14.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC
FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCCFTIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

5.47

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

15.23

-7.58

FLCC vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and FTIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCCFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-27.83%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-5.46%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-4.32%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-5.95%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.96%

+0.41%

Volatility

FLCC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCCFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

4.57%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

10.75%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

15.38%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

18.92%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

18.92%

-1.53%

FLCC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than FTIF's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FLCC
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
0.48%0.50%0.20%0.00%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.15%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCC and FTIF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIF has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FLCC (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 29.74% vs 18.08% for FLCC. On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 29.74% return vs 18.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.48% for FLCC.

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCC and FTIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer