FLCA vs. GARP
FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.96%/yr vs 20.18%/yr for GARP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
FLCA vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 20.89% return.
FLCA
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 12.97%
- 1Y
- 31.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 20.89%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 42.72%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- 20.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCA vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 10.02% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 3.99% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 20.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and GARP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FLCA and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCA vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCA
GARP
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FLCA
GARP
Energy
FLCA
GARP
Basic Materials
FLCA
GARP
Industrials
FLCA
GARP
Technology
FLCA
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
FLCA
GARP
Consumer Defensive
FLCA
GARP
-
Utilities
FLCA
GARP
Communication Services
FLCA
GARP
Real Estate
FLCA
GARP
Healthcare
FLCA
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCA vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
FLCA
GARP
FLCA vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.14 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.30 | 12.59 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.40 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.92 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.89 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -31.34% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -13.69% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.58% | -23.73% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -30.61% | +6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -1.06% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -7.36% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 3.40% | -1.31% |
Volatility
FLCA vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 3.72%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 5.06% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 13.90% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 17.87% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 21.96% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 23.89% | -4.84% |
FLCA vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCA vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.69% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCA and GARP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FLCA (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.18% vs 11.96% for FLCA. On fees, FLCA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.18% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.
FLCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCA and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer