FLCA vs. FLSW
FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.54%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for FLSW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLCA vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 1.74% return.
FLCA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCA vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 7.39% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 6.31% | 28.42% | -11.01% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 1.74% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and FLSW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FLCA and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCA vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCA
FLSW
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FLCA
FLSW
Energy
FLCA
FLSW
-
Basic Materials
FLCA
FLSW
Industrials
FLCA
FLSW
Technology
FLCA
FLSW
Consumer Cyclical
FLCA
FLSW
Consumer Defensive
FLCA
FLSW
Utilities
FLCA
FLSW
Communication Services
FLCA
FLSW
Real Estate
FLCA
FLSW
Healthcare
FLCA
-
FLSW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCA vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank
FLCA
FLSW
FLCA vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCA | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.14 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 0.90 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 2.89 | +10.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCA | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.77 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.41 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and FLSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCA | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -28.16% | -13.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -13.38% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.58% | -13.38% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -28.16% | +3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -6.36% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -5.96% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 4.16% | -2.06% |
Volatility
FLCA vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 4.10%. This indicates that FLCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCA | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.10% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 12.28% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.25% | 15.64% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 15.72% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 16.89% | +2.17% |
FLCA vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLCA and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCA vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than FLSW's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.73% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCA and FLSW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCA has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FLSW (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs FLSW's -28.16%.
On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.54% vs 6.39% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCA and FLSW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.73% for FLCA.
FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while FLSW is Europe Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index.
FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCA and FLSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer