FLC vs. FSRBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
FLC vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. FSRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -4.77% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than FSRBX's -4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed FSRBX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FSRBX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
FSRBX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. FSRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRBX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. FSRBX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
FSRBX
FLC vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.74 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.56 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 1.46 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.27 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.36 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.42 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and FSRBX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than FSRBX's 1.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.55% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FSRBX drawdown of -76.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and FSRBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -76.89% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -15.60% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -41.95% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -51.23% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -14.30% | +7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -13.30% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 6.00% | -3.74% |
Volatility
FLC vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.78% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 18.15% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 27.49% | -16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 26.90% | -12.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 29.52% | -7.46% |