FLC vs. FIDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. FIDSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 10, 1981.
Performance
FLC vs. FIDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. FIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | -9.46% | 9.33% | 27.56% | 14.53% | -8.19% | 33.13% | 1.22% | 34.25% | -16.13% | 20.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than FIDSX's -9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed FIDSX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FIDSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
FIDSX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -10.80%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. FIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDSX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. FIDSX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
FIDSX
FLC vs. FIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.00 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.15 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.15 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | -0.41 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.00 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.40 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.47 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and FIDSX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. FIDSX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than FIDSX's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.88% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 3.01% | 11.32% | 4.12% | 5.86% | 5.57% | 12.89% | 4.22% | 1.00% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. FIDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDSX drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and FIDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -74.26% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -16.60% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -24.49% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -45.48% | -9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -15.78% | +9.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -14.00% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 5.96% | -3.70% |
Volatility
FLC vs. FIDSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.53% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 13.73% | -7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 21.95% | -10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 20.95% | -6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 23.68% | -1.62% |