FLC vs. SBFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. SBFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 16, 1998.
Performance
FLC vs. SBFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. SBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -2.38% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | -6.51% | 4.29% | 24.86% | 1.50% | -13.99% | 30.74% | 0.14% | 29.11% | -14.94% | 14.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly higher than SBFAX's -6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed SBFAX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while SBFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
SBFAX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- -3.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. SBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SBFAX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. SBFAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
SBFAX
FLC vs. SBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | -0.22 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | -0.18 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | -0.26 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | -0.68 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.22 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.15 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.40 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and SBFAX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. SBFAX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, less than SBFAX's 15.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.28% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | 15.52% | 14.51% | 10.60% | 10.93% | 2.40% | 4.83% | 5.09% | 3.84% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 2.93% | 7.25% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. SBFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, which is greater than SBFAX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and SBFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -49.33% | -27.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -11.95% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -33.94% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -43.58% | -11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -9.34% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -9.53% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 4.57% | -2.28% |
Volatility
FLC vs. SBFAX - Volatility Comparison
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) at 4.12%. This indicates that FLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.12% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | 11.04% | -5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 18.20% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 19.43% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 22.85% | -0.80% |