FIDSX vs. VT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FIDSX (Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FIDSX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX returned 13.82%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VT. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIDSX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FIDSX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 13.82%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.

FIDSX

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.98%
• 6M: 9.41%
• YTD: 9.69%
• 1Y: 13.60%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 13.82%
• ALL TIME*: 11.25%

VT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 7.80%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 8.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$425.08M	$369.63M	$481.55M

FIDSX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio	9.69%	9.33%	32.82%	14.53%	-8.19%	33.13%	1.22%	34.25%	-16.13%	20.92%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.15%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and VT is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FIDSX and VT has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FIDSX vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIDSX	VT
Financial Services	98.8%	15.7%
Technology	1.2%	31.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.8%
Communication Services	-	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.6%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	11.7%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

FIDSX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIDSX

FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 15
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIDSX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIDSX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	1.59	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.23	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	2.29	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	9.54	-8.00

FIDSX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDSX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.26%	-50.27%	-23.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.60%	-9.67%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	-16.51%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.49%	-26.38%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.48%	-34.24%	-11.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-1.84%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.91%	-6.97%	-6.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.86%	2.32%	+4.54%

Volatility

FIDSX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.99%. This indicates that FIDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDSX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	3.99%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.28%	11.68%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	13.96%	+3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.65%	16.22%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.65%	17.18%	+6.47%

FIDSX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIDSX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio	1.32%	1.70%	6.03%	3.01%	11.32%	4.12%	5.86%	5.57%	12.89%	4.22%	1.00%	0.70%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDSX and VT in my portfolio?

FIDSX and VT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDSX or VT?

FIDSX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to VT (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.