PortfoliosLab logo
FIDSX vs. FSRBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and FSRBX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FIDSX:

1.16

FSRBX:

0.69

Sortino Ratio

FIDSX:

1.65

FSRBX:

1.13

Omega Ratio

FIDSX:

1.24

FSRBX:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FIDSX:

1.35

FSRBX:

0.77

Martin Ratio

FIDSX:

4.95

FSRBX:

2.21

Ulcer Index

FIDSX:

5.29%

FSRBX:

9.10%

Daily Std Dev

FIDSX:

22.98%

FSRBX:

29.89%

Max Drawdown

FIDSX:

-74.17%

FSRBX:

-76.75%

Current Drawdown

FIDSX:

-3.73%

FSRBX:

-12.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly higher than FSRBX's -3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed FSRBX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while FSRBX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.


FIDSX

YTD

3.30%

1M

6.42%

6M

-2.64%

1Y

26.57%

3Y*

15.22%

5Y*

20.81%

10Y*

11.48%

FSRBX

YTD

-3.35%

1M

6.10%

6M

-11.48%

1Y

20.55%

3Y*

8.74%

5Y*

17.73%

10Y*

8.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIDSX and FSRBX have an expense ratio of 0.73%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIDSX vs. FSRBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIDSX is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIDSX is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIDSX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIDSX is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIDSX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIDSX is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSRBX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSRBX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the FSRBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and FSRBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than FSRBX's 5.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
7.24%6.03%3.01%11.32%4.12%5.86%5.57%13.10%4.26%1.00%1.63%1.86%
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
5.90%4.49%5.35%6.12%3.36%8.63%5.90%32.73%2.57%0.76%5.64%4.51%

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FSRBX drawdown of -76.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and FSRBX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FIDSX vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 5.53%, while Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...