PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAX vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 12.42% return.


FLAX

1D
-5.68%
1M
2.36%
YTD
24.30%
6M
25.58%
1Y
48.51%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
12.42%
6M
12.76%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
24.30%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-14.34%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
12.42%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and LVHI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018

0.47

The correlation between FLAX and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLAX vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLAX
LVHI

Technology

46.4%
0.1%

Financial Services

15.6%
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.5%

Industrials

8.2%
13.4%

Communication Services

5.6%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
6.8%

Healthcare

2.9%
7.4%

Energy

2.5%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
8.6%

Utilities

1.9%
10.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

FLAX
46.4%
LVHI
0.1%

Financial Services

FLAX
15.6%
LVHI
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAX
9.1%
LVHI
5.5%

Industrials

FLAX
8.2%
LVHI
13.4%

Communication Services

FLAX
5.6%
LVHI
5.8%

Basic Materials

FLAX
3.6%
LVHI
6.8%

Healthcare

FLAX
2.9%
LVHI
7.4%

Energy

FLAX
2.5%
LVHI
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLAX
2.4%
LVHI
8.6%

Utilities

FLAX
1.9%
LVHI
10.0%

Real Estate

FLAX
1.8%
LVHI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAX vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLAXLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.63

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

5.28

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

21.81

-7.90

FLAX vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAXLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-32.31%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-6.08%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-11.99%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-11.99%

-26.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-1.19%

-4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-3.50%

-11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.47%

+2.03%

Volatility

FLAX vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.61%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAXLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

2.61%

+9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.97%

7.70%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

9.61%

+12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

11.07%

+8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

13.74%

+6.52%

FLAX vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAX vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than LVHI's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
1.46%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.74%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAX and LVHI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAX has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to LVHI (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.85% vs 7.35% for FLAX. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.46% for FLAX.

FLAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAX and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer