PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLAX vs. EWH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLAX vs. EWH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLAX tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index while EWH tracks the MSCI Hong Kong Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAX returned 7.35%/yr vs -1.00%/yr for EWH. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWH.

Performance

FLAX vs. EWH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly higher than EWH's 1.00% return.

FLAX

1D
-5.68%
1M
2.36%
YTD
24.30%
6M
25.58%
1Y
48.51%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
—

EWH

1D
-0.98%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
1.00%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
-1.00%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF		24.30%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-14.34%
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF		1.00%34.50%0.00%-13.87%-6.81%-3.49%4.17%10.74%-6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and EWH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FLAX and EWH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAX vs. EWH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLAX
EWH

Technology

46.4%

-

Financial Services

15.6%
43.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
3.9%

Industrials

8.2%
18.3%

Communication Services

5.6%
1.7%

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Healthcare

2.9%

-

Energy

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.6%

Utilities

1.9%
11.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
18.0%

Technology

FLAX
46.4%
EWH

-

Financial Services

FLAX
15.6%
EWH
43.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAX
9.1%
EWH
3.9%

Industrials

FLAX
8.2%
EWH
18.3%

Communication Services

FLAX
5.6%
EWH
1.7%

Basic Materials

FLAX
3.6%
EWH

-

Healthcare

FLAX
2.9%
EWH

-

Energy

FLAX
2.5%
EWH

-

Consumer Defensive

FLAX
2.4%
EWH
2.6%

Utilities

FLAX
1.9%
EWH
11.6%

Real Estate

FLAX
1.8%
EWH
18.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF

Often compared with FLAX:
FLAX vs. FDDFLAX vs. FLINFLAX vs. FLCHFLAX vs. EPPFLAX vs. VGTFLAX vs. IPACFLAX vs. BBAX
Often compared with EWH:
EWH vs. MCHIEWH vs. FXIEWH vs. EWSEWH vs. EWYEWH vs. EWTEWH vs. EWJEWH vs. EPP

Return for Risk

FLAX vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
EWH
EWH Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
EWH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EWH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWH Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FLAXEWHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.21
0.86

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.83
1.30

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.16

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.12

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

3.61

+10.31

FLAX vs. EWH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the EWH Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and EWH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and EWH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLAXEWHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-66.44%

+23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-12.91%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-24.93%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-41.28%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.71%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-12.58%

+6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-19.46%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.99%

-0.49%

Volatility

FLAX vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 5.32%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLAXEWHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

5.32%

+7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.97%

12.49%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

16.78%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

20.11%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

19.54%

+0.72%

FLAX vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EWH's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLAX vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than EWH's 4.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF		4.90%5.20%4.17%4.28%2.91%2.78%2.56%2.71%2.93%4.35%3.08%2.63%
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF		1.46%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLAX and EWH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAX has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to EWH (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs EWH's -66.44%.

On 5-year performance, FLAX leads with 7.35% vs -1.00% for EWH. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLAX has performed better with a 7.35% return vs -1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWH.

EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.46% for FLAX.

FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.49% for EWH.

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAX and EWH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer