FLAX vs. EMMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. FLAX is passively managed, while EMMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAX returned 7.95%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for EMMF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EMMF.

Performance

FLAX vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLAX having a 29.31% return and EMMF slightly lower at 28.01%.

FLAX

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 10.05%
• YTD: 29.31%
• 6M: 32.11%
• 1Y: 58.93%
• 3Y*: 25.00%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

EMMF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 11.20%
• YTD: 28.01%
• 6M: 29.54%
• 1Y: 49.05%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 10.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	29.31%	33.72%	9.82%	6.27%	-18.88%	-3.54%	24.17%	17.19%	-9.53%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	28.01%	21.22%	9.45%	20.59%	-13.47%	5.97%	9.25%	2.30%	-6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and EMMF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018	0.86

The correlation between FLAX and EMMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAX vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLAX	EMMF
Technology	39.7%	32.9%
Financial Services	17.2%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	14.0%
Industrials	9.2%	3.8%
Communication Services	6.5%	6.6%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.9%
Healthcare	3.3%	0.3%
Energy	3.0%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	4.4%
Utilities	2.1%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

FLAX vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX

FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 87
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLAX	EMMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	2.98	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.90	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.56	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	4.64	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	19.15	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLAX vs. EMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the EMMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and EMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLAX	EMMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	2.98	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.76	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.54	-0.10

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and EMMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLAX	EMMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.51%	-32.57%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-10.62%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.29%	-16.02%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.75%	-24.99%	-13.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-1.20%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.41%	-7.45%	-7.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	2.57%	+0.72%

Volatility

FLAX vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) at 7.23%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLAX	EMMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	7.23%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.54%	14.46%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.07%	16.57%	+2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	14.38%	+4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	16.62%	+3.31%

FLAX vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLAX vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than EMMF's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	1.85%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	1.83%	2.37%	3.12%	2.20%	2.86%	2.38%	1.57%	2.23%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLAX and EMMF in my portfolio?

FLAX and EMMF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLAX or EMMF?

FLAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to EMMF (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs EMMF's -32.57%.

Which ETF is better, FLAX or EMMF?

On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 10.81% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLAX or EMMF?

Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLAX or EMMF?

FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLAX or EMMF?

EMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.83% for FLAX.

What is the main difference between FLAX and EMMF?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.48% for EMMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.