EMMF vs. EEM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). EMMF is actively managed, while EEM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMMF returned 11.54%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for EEM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.

Performance

EMMF vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 28.05% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 30.84% return.

EMMF

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 6.90%
• YTD: 28.05%
• 6M: 29.04%
• 1Y: 46.70%
• 3Y*: 23.64%
• 5Y*: 11.54%
• 10Y*: —

EEM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 8.65%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: 32.53%
• 1Y: 56.71%
• 3Y*: 24.99%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMMF vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	28.05%	21.22%	9.45%	20.59%	-13.47%	5.97%	9.25%	2.30%	-6.45%
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	30.84%	33.98%	6.49%	8.95%	-20.56%	-3.63%	17.02%	18.22%	-10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and EEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018	0.89

The correlation between EMMF and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMMF vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMMF	EEM
Technology	32.9%	46.4%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	7.2%
Financial Services	8.2%	17.8%
Communication Services	6.6%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.4%
Industrials	3.8%	5.9%
Energy	2.1%	3.0%
Utilities	2.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	5.7%
Healthcare	0.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	-	0.9%

Return for Risk

EMMF vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 82
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

EEM

EEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMMF vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMMF	EEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.59	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.28	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	4.22	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.68	15.52	+1.16

EMMF vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and EEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMMF	EEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.57%	-66.43%	+33.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-13.52%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-17.29%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.02%	-37.49%	+13.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	0.00%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-15.99%	+8.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	3.66%	-0.85%

Volatility

EMMF vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 9.97%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMMF	EEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.97%	10.95%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.81%	19.83%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.58%	22.04%	-3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	19.39%	-4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.85%	20.69%	-3.84%

EMMF vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMMF vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than EEM's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	1.56%	2.22%	2.43%	2.63%	2.50%	1.99%	1.45%	2.76%	2.24%	1.89%	1.89%	2.49%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	1.85%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMMF and EEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EMMF and EEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMMF or EEM?

EEM has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to EMMF (9.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs EEM's -66.43%.

Which ETF is better, EMMF or EEM?

On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 11.54% vs 7.99% for EEM. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMMF or EEM?

Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMMF or EEM?

EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMMF or EEM?

EMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.56% for EEM.

What is the main difference between EMMF and EEM?

EMMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.72% for EEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.