PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKU vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKU vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKU achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FKU has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 8.97%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


FKU

1D
0.95%
1M
4.52%
6M
5.58%
YTD
12.85%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
8.97%
ALL TIME*
7.75%

FDL

1D
0.52%
1M
4.21%
6M
8.54%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$50.65M$49.05M$43.27M
$103.13K$79.21K$222.09K

FKU vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
12.85%37.97%8.06%20.59%-24.12%20.55%-6.01%32.90%-16.21%25.81%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
19.24%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FKU and FDL is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between FKU and FDL has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FKU vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FKU
FDL

Financial Services

29.3%
13.7%

Basic Materials

16.1%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.0%
4.4%

Industrials

12.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
24.3%

Communication Services

6.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
11.7%

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Energy

3.3%
11.1%

Utilities

2.4%
15.4%

Technology

-

4.3%

Financial Services

FKU
29.3%
FDL
13.7%

Basic Materials

FKU
16.1%
FDL
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FKU
13.0%
FDL
4.4%

Industrials

FKU
12.7%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

FKU
7.0%
FDL
24.3%

Communication Services

FKU
6.6%
FDL
11.2%

Healthcare

FKU
5.4%
FDL
11.7%

Real Estate

FKU
4.2%
FDL

-

Energy

FKU
3.3%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

FKU
2.4%
FDL
15.4%

Technology

FKU

-

FDL
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKU vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKU
FKU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKU vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKUFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

6.63

-4.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

15.64

-9.81

FKU vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKU and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKU vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKU drawdown since its inception was -54.39%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKU and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.39%

-65.93%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-4.27%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-12.24%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-16.46%

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.39%

-41.40%

-12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.07%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-9.59%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.81%

+2.66%

Volatility

FKU vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.55%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

8.76%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

11.87%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

14.43%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

17.16%

+6.07%

FKU vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKU has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKU vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than FDL's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.56%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
3.62%2.89%4.07%3.82%5.55%2.98%1.48%3.34%5.12%2.93%2.60%2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKU and FDL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKU has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to FDL (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKU dropped -54.39% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.14% vs 8.97% for FKU. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FKU.

FKU has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 3.56% for FDL.

FKU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FKU tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FKU and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKU and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer