PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKU vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKU vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKU achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FKU has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 7.02%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.


FKU

1D
-1.06%
1M
2.79%
YTD
5.25%
6M
11.03%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.02%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKU vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
5.25%37.97%8.06%20.59%-24.12%20.55%-6.01%32.90%-16.21%25.81%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FKU and NORW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FKU and NORW has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FKU vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FKU
NORW

Financial Services

27.7%
22.6%

Basic Materials

17.8%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
0.2%

Industrials

11.4%
13.3%

Communication Services

7.2%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
12.5%

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Energy

4.0%
29.4%

Real Estate

4.0%
0.4%

Utilities

2.7%
0.7%

Technology

-

4.1%

Financial Services

FKU
27.7%
NORW
22.6%

Basic Materials

FKU
17.8%
NORW
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FKU
13.2%
NORW
0.2%

Industrials

FKU
11.4%
NORW
13.3%

Communication Services

FKU
7.2%
NORW
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

FKU
6.7%
NORW
12.5%

Healthcare

FKU
5.3%
NORW

-

Energy

FKU
4.0%
NORW
29.4%

Real Estate

FKU
4.0%
NORW
0.4%

Utilities

FKU
2.7%
NORW
0.7%

Technology

FKU

-

NORW
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKU vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKU
FKU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKU Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKU vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKUNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.95

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.76

11.27

-6.51

FKU vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKU and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKUNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.18

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.37

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.40

-0.08

Drawdowns

FKU vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKU drawdown since its inception was -54.39%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKU and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.39%

-35.62%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-9.18%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-16.06%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.75%

-32.78%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.39%

-33.86%

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-3.53%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-10.13%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

3.21%

+1.01%

Volatility

FKU vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund (FKU) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that FKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

4.06%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

12.73%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

16.70%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

21.88%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

20.80%

+3.63%

FKU vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKU has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKU vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

FKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, which matches NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKU
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund
2.74%2.89%4.07%3.82%5.55%2.98%1.48%3.34%5.12%2.93%2.60%2.64%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKU and NORW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKU has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKU dropped -54.39% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 7.02% for FKU. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FKU.

FKU has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.72% for NORW.

FKU tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FKU and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKU and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer