FJP vs. GSJY
FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - FJP tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index while GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FJP returned 7.48%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for GSJY. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSJY.
Performance
FJP vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed GSJY with an annualized return of 7.48%, while GSJY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.
FJP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 33.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
FJP vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 14.28% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | -12.83% | -1.13% | 3.60% | 7.72% | -18.60% | 27.63% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJP and GSJY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FJP and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJP vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJP
GSJY
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
FJP
GSJY
Consumer Cyclical
FJP
GSJY
Basic Materials
FJP
GSJY
Technology
FJP
GSJY
Utilities
FJP
GSJY
Financial Services
FJP
GSJY
Energy
FJP
GSJY
Healthcare
FJP
GSJY
Real Estate
FJP
GSJY
Consumer Defensive
FJP
GSJY
Communication Services
FJP
GSJY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJP vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank
FJP
GSJY
FJP vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJP | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.12 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 7.09 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJP | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.54 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.54 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FJP vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than GSJY's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and GSJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJP | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -32.53% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -14.08% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | -14.96% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -32.53% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -32.53% | -8.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -2.62% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -7.58% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 4.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FJP vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) at 4.21%. This indicates that FJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJP | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 4.21% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 15.17% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 19.48% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 18.07% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 17.04% | +1.84% |
FJP vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJP vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison
FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than GSJY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.49% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJP and GSJY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FJP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to GSJY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs GSJY's -32.53%.
On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.28% vs 7.48% for FJP. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.
FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.25% for GSJY.
FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJP and GSJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer