PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJP vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJP vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 7.86%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


FJP

1D
-3.66%
1M
0.74%
YTD
14.36%
6M
13.78%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
7.86%

DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJP vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
14.36%33.60%5.80%23.00%-12.83%-1.13%3.60%7.72%-18.60%27.63%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FJP and DGRW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.54

The correlation between FJP and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FJP vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJP
DGRW

Industrials

43.7%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
7.1%

Technology

10.7%
32.1%

Basic Materials

10.4%
3.3%

Utilities

5.7%
0.2%

Financial Services

5.5%
11.3%

Energy

3.4%
5.0%

Healthcare

3.4%
12.8%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Communication Services

1.0%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
6.7%

Industrials

FJP
43.7%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FJP
12.4%
DGRW
7.1%

Technology

FJP
10.7%
DGRW
32.1%

Basic Materials

FJP
10.4%
DGRW
3.3%

Utilities

FJP
5.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Financial Services

FJP
5.5%
DGRW
11.3%

Energy

FJP
3.4%
DGRW
5.0%

Healthcare

FJP
3.4%
DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

FJP
3.1%
DGRW

-

Communication Services

FJP
1.0%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FJP
0.8%
DGRW
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJP vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJP
FJP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJP vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJPDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.04

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

8.67

-1.60

FJP vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJP and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJP vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-32.04%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

-8.30%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-16.21%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-17.27%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

-32.04%

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-3.32%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-3.01%

-8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

1.95%

+2.98%

Volatility

FJP vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.75%. This indicates that FJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

3.75%

+4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

8.26%

+9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

10.30%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

14.01%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

16.21%

+2.70%

FJP vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJP vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than DGRW's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
2.49%2.68%3.18%3.49%2.21%2.43%0.99%2.80%1.54%1.29%1.46%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJP and DGRW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJP has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to DGRW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.14% vs 7.86% for FJP. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.

FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

FJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.28% for DGRW.

FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJP and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer