FIX vs. FNGU
FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Over the past year, FIX returned 281.93% vs 25.83% for FNGU. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FIX vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 101.37% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 3.96% return.
FIX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 101.37%
- 6M
- 94.15%
- 1Y
- 281.93%
- 3Y*
- 128.82%
- 5Y*
- 86.97%
- 10Y*
- 51.27%
FNGU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -13.99%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIX vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 101.37% | 136.60% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 3.96% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIX and FNGU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FIX and FNGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIX vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
FIX
FNGU
FIX vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIX | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.11 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.58 | 0.36 | +17.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.47 | 0.85 | +58.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIX vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and FNGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIX | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -61.30% | -32.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.78% | -59.55% | +43.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -27.36% | +19.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.06% | -22.25% | -15.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 24.91% | -20.25% |
Volatility
FIX vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 15.34%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIX | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 27.31% | -11.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.30% | 50.15% | -11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.05% | 61.43% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.66% | 79.93% | -35.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 79.93% | -37.49% |
Dividends
FIX vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIX and FNGU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to FIX (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs FNGU's -61.30%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.13 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIX and FNGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer