FIVA vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity International Value Factor Index while RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 13.11%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for RODM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

FIVA vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 10.16% return.

FIVA

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 13.25%
• 6M: 13.22%
• 1Y: 37.08%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	13.25%	45.83%	2.53%	20.38%	-10.37%	15.90%	-1.78%	19.78%	-18.62%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	10.16%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and RODM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.90

The correlation between FIVA and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIVA	RODM
Financial Services	27.4%	26.6%
Industrials	16.5%	16.7%
Technology	15.2%	10.5%
Healthcare	8.0%	9.0%
Basic Materials	7.7%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.0%
Energy	4.9%	6.3%
Utilities	3.3%	4.8%
Communication Services	3.0%	5.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	3.5%

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 73
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 74
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.21	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.12	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.40	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.44	13.45	-1.02

FIVA vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-35.98%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-7.10%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-10.58%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-28.85%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-2.16%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-6.36%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	1.79%	+1.20%

Volatility

FIVA vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	3.21%	+2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	8.77%	+4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.95%	10.95%	+5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	13.45%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	15.08%	+2.87%

FIVA vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVA vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than RODM's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.66%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.82%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and RODM in my portfolio?

FIVA and RODM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVA or RODM?

FIVA has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or RODM?

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 13.11% vs 9.67% for RODM. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or RODM?

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or RODM?

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.66% for FIVA.

What is the main difference between FIVA and RODM?

FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.