PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. FELG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIVA vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIVA vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
4.22%45.83%2.53%5.00%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
-9.08%18.44%35.45%4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's -9.08% return.


FIVA

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
4.22%
6M
13.27%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*

FELG

1D
1.04%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-9.08%
6M
-8.16%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIVA vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FELG
FELG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVAFELGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

0.87

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

1.41

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.20

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.28

+1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.22

4.39

+7.84

FIVA vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FELG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVAFELGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.87

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.97

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FELG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FIVA vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than FELG's 0.40% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.73%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.38%0.44%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FELG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAFELGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-23.89%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-16.17%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

-11.99%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-3.57%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.73%

-1.72%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) have volatilities of 7.08% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIVAFELGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

6.95%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

12.45%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

22.60%

-5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

20.23%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

20.23%

-2.35%