FIVA vs. COST

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.95%/yr vs 22.12%/yr for COST. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FIVA vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 14.24% return.

FIVA

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 15.07%
• 6M: 17.30%
• 1Y: 36.22%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: —

COST

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 22.12%
• 10Y*: 22.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	15.07%	45.83%	2.53%	20.38%	-10.37%	15.90%	-1.78%	19.78%	-18.62%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	14.24%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and COST is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.31

The correlation between FIVA and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 77
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 37
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 32
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	-0.08	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	0.02	+3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.00	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	-0.10	+3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	-0.22	+12.35

FIVA vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-53.39%	+13.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-15.14%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-20.74%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-31.40%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.23%	+10.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.75%	-13.36%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	6.67%	-3.67%

Volatility

FIVA vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) is 5.93%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that FIVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	7.44%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.25%	14.53%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	18.80%	-2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	22.72%	-6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	21.95%	-4.00%

Dividends

FIVA vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.55%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.48%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and COST in my portfolio?

FIVA and COST have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVA or COST?

COST has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to FIVA (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.