FITZ vs. VEGN
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FITZ is actively managed, while VEGN is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for VEGN.
Performance
FITZ vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEGN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 50.54%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.46% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and VEGN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank
FITZ
VEGN
FITZ vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITZ | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -6.98 | 0.86 | -7.85 |
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and VEGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -34.14% | +32.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -0.64% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -7.59% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility
FITZ vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 16.26% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.00% | 20.27% | -10.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.00% | 22.77% | -12.77% |
FITZ vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and VEGN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEGN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEGN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.60% for VEGN.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and VEGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer