VEGN vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEGN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the US Vegan Climate Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEGN returned 16.68%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEGN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

VEGN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGN achieves a 34.36% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.41% return.

VEGN

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 10.45%
• YTD: 34.36%
• 6M: 33.80%
• 1Y: 53.65%
• 3Y*: 30.07%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 40.91%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF	34.36%	13.71%	25.42%	38.10%	-26.87%	26.01%	27.72%	9.45%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	20.41%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGN and QQQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019	0.92

The correlation between VEGN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEGN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEGN	QQQ
Technology	63.0%	58.7%
Financial Services	13.3%	0.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	14.3%
Healthcare	4.8%	3.7%
Industrials	4.7%	2.6%
Real Estate	3.1%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	11.4%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.0%
Utilities	0.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

VEGN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGN

VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 88
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 87

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEGN	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.33	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.03	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.41	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.55	3.44	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.84	12.79	+5.05

VEGN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGN Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VEGN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGN drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGN and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEGN	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-82.97%	+48.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-11.96%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	-22.77%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.40%	-35.12%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.99%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-32.73%	+25.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	3.21%	-0.19%

Volatility

VEGN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that VEGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEGN	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.16%	8.47%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.32%	14.20%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	17.67%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	22.64%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.90%	22.43%	+0.47%

VEGN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEGN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than QQQ's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.41%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF	0.48%	0.51%	0.51%	0.67%	0.81%	0.41%	0.71%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEGN and QQQ in my portfolio?

VEGN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VEGN or QQQ?

VEGN has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGN dropped -34.14% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, VEGN or QQQ?

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.94% vs 16.68% for VEGN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VEGN or QQQ?

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 16.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEGN or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VEGN or QQQ?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.48% for VEGN.

What is the main difference between VEGN and QQQ?

VEGN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Beyond Investing and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VEGN and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.