FITZ vs. SPIT
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
FITZ vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -2.34% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and SPIT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -12.49% | +5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -7.19% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -2.59% | -1.30% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 26.21% | -10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 26.21% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 26.21% | -10.83% |
FITZ vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.75% | 7.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and SPIT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer