FITZ vs. ESLG
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and ESLG (Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ESLG.
Performance
FITZ vs. ESLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESLG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. ESLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -2.34% |
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and ESLG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. ESLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. ESLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum ESLG drawdown of -12.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and ESLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | ESLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -12.36% | +4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -3.06% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -3.17% | -0.72% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. ESLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | ESLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 16.70% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 16.70% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 16.70% | -1.32% |
FITZ vs. ESLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ESLG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. ESLG - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.28% | 0.04% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and ESLG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESLG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESLG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
ESLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.39% for ESLG.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and ESLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer