BLOX vs. HOOW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOX returned -5.57% vs 4.80% for HOOW. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.

Performance

BLOX vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -6.36% return.

BLOX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -9.66%
• 6M: -7.95%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 1Y: -5.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOW

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: 23.57%
• 6M: -8.41%
• YTD: -6.36%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOX vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	1.20%	9.24%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-6.36%	52.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOX and HOOW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.69

The correlation between BLOX and HOOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLOX vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOX

BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOX vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOX	HOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	0.05	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	0.70	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.08	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.07	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.19	0.11	-0.30

BLOX vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the HOOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOX and HOOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOX vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and HOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOX	HOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.09%	-65.74%	+18.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.09%	-65.74%	+18.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.04%	-36.40%	+6.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.08%	-30.40%	+11.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.24%	39.03%	-14.79%

Volatility

BLOX vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) is 14.17%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 22.70%. This indicates that BLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOX	HOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.17%	22.70%	-8.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.65%	63.55%	-22.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.38%	83.67%	-29.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.63%	83.93%	-30.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.63%	83.93%	-30.30%

BLOX vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOX vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.86%, less than HOOW's 124.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	46.85%	22.69%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	124.36%	67.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOX and HOOW in my portfolio?

BLOX and HOOW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOX or HOOW?

HOOW has higher volatility (22.70%) compared to BLOX (14.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOX dropped -47.09% vs HOOW's -65.74%.

Which ETF is better, BLOX or HOOW?

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with 4.80% vs -5.57% for BLOX. On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BLOX has been the lower-risk option at 14.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOX or HOOW?

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a 4.80% return vs -5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOX or HOOW?

HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOX or HOOW?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 124.36%, compared with 46.85% for BLOX.

What is the main difference between BLOX and HOOW?

BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.99% for HOOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.