PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHDG vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BHDG

1D
1.46%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BHDG and ZCSH is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHDG vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHDG

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHDGZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.91

0.10

-1.00

Drawdowns

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHDGZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-93.73%

+78.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-15.71%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-74.41%

+65.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

Volatility

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHDGZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

166.02%

-147.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

136.87%

-118.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

136.87%

-118.17%

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHDG vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BHDG nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BHDG and ZCSH have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BHDG is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BHDG is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

BHDG and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHDG and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer