PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITE vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITE vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 25.01% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 15.96% return.


FITE

1D
1.14%
1M
-5.38%
6M
15.88%
YTD
25.01%
1Y
42.30%
3Y*
29.02%
5Y*
15.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.58%

GXPT

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.06%
6M
18.54%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$864.27K$865.45K$935.71K
$16.90M$9.61M$5.72M

FITE vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FITE and GXPT is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.60

The correlation between FITE and GXPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITE vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITE
FITE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITE vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITEGXPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.42

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

3.74

+2.59

FITE vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITE Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the GXPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITE and GXPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITE vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITEGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-18.74%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.35%

-18.74%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.00%

-9.42%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-5.45%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

7.11%

-0.82%

Volatility

FITE vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) have volatilities of 7.58% and 7.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITEGXPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

7.73%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.04%

19.35%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.53%

23.54%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.04%

23.29%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

23.29%

-0.02%

FITE vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITE vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than GXPT's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FITE
SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
0.13%0.23%0.12%0.13%0.12%0.92%0.88%0.44%1.79%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.22%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITE and GXPT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXPT has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to FITE (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITE dropped -36.90% vs GXPT's -18.74%.

On 1-year performance, FITE leads with 42.30% vs 29.12% for GXPT. On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FITE has performed better with a 42.30% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.13% for FITE.

FITE tracks S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.15% for GXPT.

FITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITE and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer