FITE vs. ROKT
FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FITE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FITE returned 18.73%/yr vs 25.88%/yr for ROKT. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
FITE vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 38.91% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 52.20% return.
FITE
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.61%
- YTD
- 38.91%
- 6M
- 44.36%
- 1Y
- 70.32%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ROKT
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 16.83%
- YTD
- 52.20%
- 6M
- 68.76%
- 1Y
- 122.71%
- 3Y*
- 46.59%
- 5Y*
- 25.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FITE vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | 38.91% | 27.73% | 21.63% | 28.48% | -17.98% | 14.45% | 20.38% | 33.96% | -9.52% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 52.20% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITE and ROKT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FITE and ROKT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FITE vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FITE
ROKT
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FITE
ROKT
Industrials
FITE
ROKT
Communication Services
FITE
ROKT
Healthcare
FITE
ROKT
-
Energy
FITE
ROKT
Basic Materials
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Consumer Cyclical
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Consumer Defensive
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Financial Services
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Real Estate
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Utilities
FITE
-
ROKT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITE vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
FITE
ROKT
FITE vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITE | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.88 | 4.31 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.64 | 4.87 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.62 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 10.69 | -6.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 39.68 | -25.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITE | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 4.31 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.15 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.89 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
FITE vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and ROKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITE | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -43.16% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.35% | -11.40% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.07% | -23.46% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -23.46% | -3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.31% | +5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.40% | -6.75% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 3.07% | +2.13% |
Volatility
FITE vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) is 7.23%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 12.31%. This indicates that FITE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITE | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 12.31% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.71% | 24.76% | -5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.57% | 28.61% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 22.72% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 25.11% | -2.08% |
FITE vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FITE and ROKT have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
FITE vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than ROKT's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | 0.15% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.44% | 1.79% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITE and ROKT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROKT has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to FITE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITE dropped -36.90% vs ROKT's -43.16%.
On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 25.88% vs 18.73% for FITE. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, FITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 25.88% return vs 18.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FITE and ROKT have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.15% for FITE.
FITE is categorized as Technology Equities, while ROKT is Industrials Equities. FITE tracks S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index.
ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FITE and ROKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer