FIPDX vs. FCNVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIPDX (Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - FIPDX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities Index, while FCNVX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FIPDX returned 2.52%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for FCNVX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIPDX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.

Performance

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPDX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIPDX having a 2.52% annualized return and FCNVX not far ahead at 2.57%.

FIPDX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 0.89%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: 3.67%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 2.52%

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund	0.78%	6.90%	2.00%	3.77%	-12.09%	5.94%	10.90%	8.32%	-1.37%	2.98%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.40%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPDX and FCNVX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012	0.16

The correlation between FIPDX and FCNVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIPDX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPDX

FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIPDX	FCNVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	3.44	-2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	22.92	-21.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	13.46	-12.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	40.73	-38.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	139.01	-133.55

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPDX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPDX drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPDX and FCNVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIPDX	FCNVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.32%	-2.19%	-12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.94%	-0.10%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.49%	-0.30%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.32%	-0.59%	-13.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.32%	-2.19%	-12.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.10%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-0.05%	-4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.03%	+0.64%

Volatility

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.35%. This indicates that FIPDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIPDX	FCNVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	0.35%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	0.79%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	1.18%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	1.29%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.37%	1.04%	+4.33%

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPDX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIPDX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

FIPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than FCNVX's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.15%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund	3.82%	4.18%	3.75%	3.56%	8.87%	4.76%	1.24%	1.97%	2.26%	1.29%	1.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIPDX and FCNVX in my portfolio?

FIPDX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIPDX or FCNVX?

FIPDX has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to FCNVX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPDX dropped -14.32% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.