FCNVX vs. FJTDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX).
FCNVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011. FJTDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 31, 2018.
Performance
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 0.52% | 4.51% | 5.43% | 5.86% | 0.85% | -0.06% | 1.10% | 3.00% | 0.42% |
FJTDX Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund | 0.55% | 4.75% | 5.69% | 5.48% | 1.00% | 0.16% | 1.57% | 3.20% | 0.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than FJTDX's 0.55% return.
FCNVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
FJTDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FJTDX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FCNVX vs. FJTDX — Risk / Return Rank
FCNVX
FJTDX
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCNVX | FJTDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 3.21 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.52 | 11.70 | +2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.34 | 4.96 | +1.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.58 | 15.13 | +6.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.59 | 67.60 | +16.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCNVX | FJTDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 3.21 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.69 | 2.49 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 2.37 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNVX and FJTDX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Dividend Comparison
FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FJTDX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 3.91% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
FJTDX Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund | 4.11% | 4.63% | 5.42% | 4.70% | 1.39% | 0.36% | 1.45% | 2.65% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, which is greater than FJTDX's maximum drawdown of -1.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and FJTDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNVX | FJTDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -1.90% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -0.30% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.59% | -0.90% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.08% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.07% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FCNVX vs. FJTDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX) have volatilities of 0.10% and 0.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCNVX | FJTDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.81% | 0.87% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 1.35% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 1.41% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.03% | 1.27% | -0.24% |