PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNVX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 2.58%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.51% annualized return.


FCNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.58%

FXNAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.53%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
1.50%4.51%5.43%5.86%0.85%-0.06%1.10%3.00%1.82%1.42%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.31%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and FXNAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011

0.26

The correlation between FCNVX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNVX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX
FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNVXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+21.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

13.78

1.21

+12.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

41.82

1.59

+40.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

142.60

4.82

+137.78

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNVXFXNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

1.19

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.79

0.01

+2.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.48

0.30

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

0.45

+1.75

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNVXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-19.51%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-2.94%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-6.16%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.59%

-18.54%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.19%

-19.51%

+17.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.98%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-3.86%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.97%

-0.94%

Volatility

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.33%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNVXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

1.36%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.78%

2.80%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18%

3.96%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.29%

6.07%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.04%

5.00%

-3.96%

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCNVX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FXNAX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.15%4.41%5.17%4.97%1.24%0.24%0.99%2.45%2.21%1.30%1.01%0.48%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNVX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to FCNVX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNVX dropped -2.19% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNVX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer