PortfoliosLab logo
FCNVX vs. FSHBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and FSHBX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCNVX:

3.54

FSHBX:

2.58

Sortino Ratio

FCNVX:

16.64

FSHBX:

4.31

Omega Ratio

FCNVX:

6.33

FSHBX:

1.64

Calmar Ratio

FCNVX:

25.95

FSHBX:

5.59

Martin Ratio

FCNVX:

121.80

FSHBX:

16.03

Ulcer Index

FCNVX:

0.04%

FSHBX:

0.33%

Daily Std Dev

FCNVX:

1.45%

FSHBX:

2.07%

Max Drawdown

FCNVX:

-2.19%

FSHBX:

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

FCNVX:

-0.10%

FSHBX:

-0.59%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCNVX having a 1.39% return and FSHBX slightly higher at 1.41%. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has outperformed FSHBX with an annualized return of 2.25%, while FSHBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


FCNVX

YTD

1.39%

1M

0.46%

6M

2.30%

1Y

5.15%

5Y*

2.91%

10Y*

2.25%

FSHBX

YTD

1.41%

1M

0.24%

6M

2.23%

1Y

5.37%

5Y*

1.64%

10Y*

1.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCNVX vs. FSHBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNVX is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSHBX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSHBX is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSHBX is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSHBX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSHBX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSHBX is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the FSHBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and FSHBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than FSHBX's 4.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.86%5.12%4.97%1.65%0.29%1.01%2.46%2.20%1.30%0.93%0.54%0.39%
FSHBX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund
4.14%4.01%3.00%1.15%0.94%2.06%2.13%1.78%1.28%1.00%1.02%0.92%

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum FSHBX drawdown of -6.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and FSHBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FCNVX vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.39%, while Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...