FINT vs. SPDW
FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FINT is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 31.76% vs 32.15% for SPDW. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
FINT vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FINT having a 14.98% return and SPDW slightly higher at 15.00%.
FINT
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDW
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
FINT vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 14.98% | 29.12% | -0.15% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 15.00% | 34.75% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINT and SPDW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FINT and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINT vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
FINT
SPDW
FINT vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINT | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.80 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 10.93 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINT | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.07 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.24 | +1.75 |
Drawdowns
FINT vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINT | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -60.02% | +46.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -11.55% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -0.87% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -12.91% | +11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility
FINT vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) is 4.92%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that FINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINT | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.63% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 13.17% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 15.60% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 16.49% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.26% | -1.36% |
FINT vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINT vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 1.91% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FINT and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to FINT (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 1-year performance, SPDW leads with 32.15% vs 31.76% for FINT. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 32.15% return vs 31.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.91% for FINT.
They also come from different issuers: Frontier and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.04% for SPDW.
FINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FINT and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer