FINT vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FINT is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 33.22% vs 75.77% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

FINT vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINT achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 42.01% return.

FINT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 16.61%
• 6M: 17.36%
• 1Y: 33.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 42.01%
• 6M: 43.79%
• 1Y: 75.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINT vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	16.61%	29.12%	-0.77%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	42.01%	40.01%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FINT and PATN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	0.90

The correlation between FINT and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FINT vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINT

FINT Risk / Return Rank: 71
FINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FINT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FINT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 91
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINT vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FINT	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	3.27	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.97	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.58	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	5.29	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.75	20.66	-7.91

FINT vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINT and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FINT vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum PATN drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINT	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-16.77%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-14.40%	+4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-3.16%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.68%	-1.07%

Volatility

FINT vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) is 5.82%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that FINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FINT	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	11.59%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.84%	20.64%	-7.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	23.34%	-8.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	21.92%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	21.92%	-5.71%

FINT vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FINT vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than PATN's 1.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	1.88%	2.20%	0.00%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.53%	2.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINT and PATN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FINT and PATN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FINT or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to FINT (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, FINT or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 75.77% vs 33.22% for FINT. On fees, PATN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FINT or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 75.77% return vs 33.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FINT or PATN?

PATN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FINT or PATN?

FINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.53% for PATN.

What is the main difference between FINT and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.