FIKLX vs. SWASX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) and Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX).
FIKLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | -3.24% | 22.93% | -9.39% | 4.32% | -26.54% | 12.03% | 5.85% | 28.22% | -2.29% |
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.15% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKLX achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than SWASX's -0.15% return.
FIKLX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -10.33%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SWASX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIKLX vs. SWASX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKLX
SWASX
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) and Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKLX | SWASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.76 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.10 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 3.87 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKLX | SWASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.76 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.09 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.10 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKLX and SWASX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Dividend Comparison
FIKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SWASX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | 3.20% | 3.10% | 5.24% | 2.12% | 4.60% | 5.63% | 1.94% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.22% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKLX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum SWASX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKLX and SWASX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKLX | SWASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -69.47% | +32.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -10.89% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -32.31% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.67% | -10.36% | -9.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.69% | -15.62% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.66% | +0.58% |
Volatility
FIKLX vs. SWASX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) at 4.17%. This indicates that FIKLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKLX | SWASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 4.17% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 7.69% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 13.27% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 15.38% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.04% | -2.30% |