FIJDX vs. USAGX
FIJDX (Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z) and USAGX (USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund) are both mutual funds - FIJDX is a Gold fund actively managed by Fidelity, while USAGX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Victory. Over the past 5 years, FIJDX returned 15.05%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for USAGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIJDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for USAGX.
Performance
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJDX achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -13.20% return.
FIJDX
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -15.15%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 6M
- -14.51%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- 36.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- —
USAGX
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -15.25%
- YTD
- -13.20%
- 6M
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- 42.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | -10.74% | 143.25% | 15.10% | -0.26% | -13.32% | -10.33% | 27.00% | 35.74% | 4.09% |
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | -13.20% | 156.06% | 10.76% | 6.73% | -11.80% | -10.14% | 25.85% | 42.97% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJDX and USAGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FIJDX and USAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIJDX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIJDX
USAGX
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIJDX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 3.13 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and USAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJDX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -80.89% | +30.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.39% | -36.13% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.39% | -36.13% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.91% | -45.72% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.63% | -35.04% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -43.05% | +24.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 13.62% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) at 17.03%. This indicates that FIJDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIJDX | USAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.10% | 17.03% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.30% | 38.11% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.49% | 44.97% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 33.42% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.70% | 32.95% | +1.75% |
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIJDX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison
FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than USAGX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | 5.74% | 2.17% | 3.63% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FIJDX and USAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIJDX has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to USAGX (17.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs USAGX's -80.89%.
USAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIJDX and USAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer