FIDSX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
FIDSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 10, 1981. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
FIDSX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDSX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | -9.46% | 9.33% | 27.56% | 14.53% | -8.19% | 33.13% | 1.22% | 34.25% | -16.13% | 20.92% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 11.65%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
FIDSX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -10.80%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDSX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDSX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
FIDSX
FLC
FIDSX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDSX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 0.55 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 0.75 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.70 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 2.71 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDSX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 0.55 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | -0.04 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.24 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.28 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDSX and FLC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIDSX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than FLC's 7.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.88% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 3.01% | 11.32% | 4.12% | 5.86% | 5.57% | 12.89% | 4.22% | 1.00% | 0.70% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
FIDSX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDSX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.26% | -76.79% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -8.69% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -40.14% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.48% | -55.27% | +9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.78% | -6.77% | -9.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -10.92% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 2.26% | +3.70% |
Volatility
FIDSX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.25%. This indicates that FIDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDSX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.25% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 5.78% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 11.34% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 14.23% | +6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 22.06% | +1.62% |