FICO vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) is a stock, while QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 26.67%/yr vs 35.29%/yr for QLD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FICO vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -28.59% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 31.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 26.67%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.29% annualized return.

FICO

• 1D: 6.16%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: -28.59%
• 6M: -31.42%
• 1Y: -31.98%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 19.71%
• 10Y*: 26.67%

QLD

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 31.05%
• 6M: 26.63%
• 1Y: 69.67%
• 3Y*: 46.32%
• 5Y*: 23.57%
• 10Y*: 35.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICO vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	-28.59%	-15.08%	71.04%	94.46%	38.03%	-15.14%	36.39%	100.36%	22.06%	28.52%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	31.05%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FICO and QLD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FICO and QLD has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FICO vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICO

FICO Risk / Return Rank: 17
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 63
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICO vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FICO	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	2.10	-2.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	2.52	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.34	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.79	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	9.64	-10.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FICO vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FICO	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	2.10	-2.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.53	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.79	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.58	-0.09

Drawdowns

FICO vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FICO	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.26%	-83.13%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.12%	-25.13%	-26.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	-42.29%	-18.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.28%	-63.68%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.28%	-63.68%	+2.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.32%	-8.24%	-41.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-18.16%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.06%	7.25%	+19.81%

Volatility

FICO vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 13.78%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FICO	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.53%	13.78%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.17%	26.34%	+12.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.75%	33.42%	+17.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.72%	44.95%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.08%	44.68%	-6.60%

Dividends

FICO vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.07%	0.08%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FICO and QLD in my portfolio?

FICO and QLD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FICO or QLD?

FICO has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to QLD (13.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.