FICO vs. KMB
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 26.62%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FICO vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -30.25% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 26.62%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
FICO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- -30.25%
- 6M
- -36.09%
- 1Y
- -33.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 26.62%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
FICO vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -30.25% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and KMB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FICO and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$28.00B
KMB:
$34.08B
FICO:
$31.51
KMB:
$5.93
FICO:
37.43
KMB:
17.26
FICO:
1.99
KMB:
2.98
FICO:
12.60
KMB:
2.06
FICO:
$2.26B
KMB:
$16.54B
FICO:
$1.90B
KMB:
$5.93B
FICO:
$1.16B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
KMB
FICO vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.87 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.67 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.03 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICO vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -36.97% | -42.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.12% | -29.60% | -22.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -34.06% | -27.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | -34.06% | -27.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | -34.06% | -27.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -26.52% | -23.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -8.85% | -9.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.47% | 19.43% | +8.04% |
Volatility
FICO vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.33% | 8.42% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.21% | 16.67% | +22.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.67% | 25.77% | +24.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.73% | 20.19% | +20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.07% | 21.07% | +17.00% |
Dividends
FICO vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
FICO vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and KMB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs KMB's -36.97%.
FICO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICO and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer