FHSNX vs. VTMFX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

FHSNX (Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FHSNX returned 3.71%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for VTMFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHSNX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.

Performance

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHSNX having a 5.36% return and VTMFX slightly higher at 5.57%.

FHSNX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 5.36%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 1Y: 11.02%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: —

VTMFX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: 5.57%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHSNX Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund	5.36%	12.26%	7.18%	9.32%	-15.16%	5.16%	20.21%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	5.57%	11.28%	12.17%	15.55%	-12.69%	13.10%	21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FHSNX and VTMFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020	0.82

The correlation between FHSNX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHSNX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHSNX

FHSNX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FHSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FHSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FHSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FHSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FHSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VTMFX

VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 74
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHSNX	VTMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.11	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.98	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.54	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.92	11.72	-0.80

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHSNX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHSNX and VTMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHSNX	VTMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.53%	-28.49%	+8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.41%	-5.38%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.69%	-10.61%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.53%	-17.40%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-0.43%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-3.54%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.16%	-0.13%

Volatility

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHSNX	VTMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	2.56%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.06%	5.24%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.86%	6.47%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.07%	8.58%	-1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.34%	9.13%	-1.79%

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHSNX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

FHSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than VTMFX's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHSNX Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund	2.90%	2.93%	3.06%	3.01%	3.71%	2.57%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	2.20%	2.14%	2.08%	1.94%	1.85%	1.38%	1.72%	2.05%	2.22%	2.00%	2.13%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHSNX and VTMFX in my portfolio?

FHSNX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHSNX or VTMFX?

VTMFX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to FHSNX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHSNX dropped -19.53% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.