FHLSX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHLSX (Fidelity Health Savings Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FHLSX returned 4.43%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHLSX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLSX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.

FHLSX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 15.60%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: —

PALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHLSX Fidelity Health Savings Fund	7.13%	12.15%	6.93%	9.70%	-14.89%	5.37%	20.55%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	31.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLSX and PALDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2020	0.85

The correlation between FHLSX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHLSX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLSX

FHLSX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FHLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FHLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FHLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FHLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FHLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLSX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	2.73	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	3.92	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.52	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	3.62	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.53	17.16	-1.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLSX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLSX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	2.73	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.79	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.81	+0.20

Drawdowns

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLSX drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLSX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLSX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-26.16%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.43%	-5.96%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.66%	-16.06%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.18%	-20.47%	+1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-4.09%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	1.25%	-0.24%

Volatility

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Fund (FHLSX) is 2.03%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that FHLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLSX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.03%	2.30%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.80%	6.18%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70%	7.89%	-2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.73%	12.11%	-5.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.99%	12.69%	-5.70%

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLSX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHLSX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FHLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLSX Fidelity Health Savings Fund	2.76%	2.95%	2.89%	2.78%	3.72%	2.71%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLSX and PALDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FHLSX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHLSX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FHLSX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLSX dropped -19.18% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.