PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTAX vs. FDTTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
-5.15%26.58%25.62%26.18%-9.26%25.98%12.59%30.74%-7.68%17.54%
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
-5.13%27.28%26.68%23.86%-8.28%24.97%8.84%30.98%-9.36%16.36%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGTAX having a -5.15% return and FDTTX slightly higher at -5.13%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGTAX having a 14.76% annualized return and FDTTX not far behind at 14.37%.


FGTAX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
-5.15%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
14.76%

FDTTX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-8.10%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTTX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FGTAX vs. FDTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTAX
FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTTX
FDTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGTAXFDTTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.87

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.75

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.97

8.04

-0.08

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FDTTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTAX and FDTTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGTAXFDTTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.81

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.77

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.50

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FGTAX and FDTTX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Dividend Comparison

FGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than FDTTX's 11.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
3.92%3.72%2.48%1.86%4.17%4.61%7.84%12.91%21.65%16.21%1.75%3.75%
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
11.35%10.77%9.20%4.34%5.64%5.60%4.40%7.49%16.04%5.52%2.74%5.82%

Drawdowns

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTAX drawdown since its inception was -53.07%, smaller than the maximum FDTTX drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTAX and FDTTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTAXFDTTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.07%

-58.00%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-12.43%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-21.88%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-36.62%

+1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

-9.65%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-11.20%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.70%

-0.09%

Volatility

FGTAX vs. FDTTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGTAXFDTTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.49%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

9.55%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

18.41%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

17.59%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.83%

-0.74%