FDTTX vs. AUXFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDTTX (Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A) and AUXFX (Auxier Focus Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDTTX returned 16.04%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for AUXFX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTTX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for AUXFX.

Performance

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than AUXFX's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTTX has outperformed AUXFX with an annualized return of 16.04%, while AUXFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.

FDTTX

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 9.09%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 25.34%
• 5Y*: 16.12%
• 10Y*: 16.04%

AUXFX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 6M: 6.86%
• 1Y: 16.86%
• 3Y*: 13.61%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A	9.09%	27.28%	26.68%	23.86%	-8.28%	24.97%	8.84%	30.98%	-9.36%	16.36%
AUXFX Auxier Focus Fund	7.37%	15.23%	11.31%	9.76%	-4.52%	20.03%	6.04%	20.20%	-4.13%	17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTTX and AUXFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 1999	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between FDTTX and AUXFX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FDTTX vs. AUXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTTX

FDTTX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FDTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FDTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FDTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FDTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FDTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AUXFX

AUXFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
AUXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AUXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AUXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AUXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AUXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDTTX	AUXFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.05	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.00	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.37	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.29	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.78	11.81	+1.98

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the AUXFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTTX and AUXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than AUXFX's maximum drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and AUXFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTTX	AUXFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.00%	-39.82%	-18.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-5.42%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.03%	-9.30%	-10.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	-15.73%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.62%	-33.69%	-2.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-1.42%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.13%	-4.41%	-6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.51%	+0.63%

Volatility

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) at 2.60%. This indicates that FDTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTTX	AUXFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	2.60%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	6.31%	+3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.93%	8.70%	+4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	12.17%	+5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.87%	15.20%	+3.67%

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AUXFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTTX vs. AUXFX - Dividend Comparison

FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than AUXFX's 2.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUXFX Auxier Focus Fund	2.64%	2.84%	3.41%	4.38%	3.02%	2.49%	2.36%	6.03%	6.82%	5.52%	2.77%	5.76%
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A	9.87%	10.77%	9.20%	4.34%	5.64%	5.60%	4.40%	7.49%	16.04%	5.52%	2.74%	5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTTX and AUXFX in my portfolio?

FDTTX and AUXFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDTTX or AUXFX?

FDTTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to AUXFX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTTX dropped -58.00% vs AUXFX's -39.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.