FGTAX vs. EILGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGTAX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A) and EILGX (Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth) are both mutual funds - FGTAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while EILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, FGTAX returned 16.13%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for EILGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGTAX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EILGX.

Performance

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTAX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than EILGX's -11.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTAX has outperformed EILGX with an annualized return of 16.13%, while EILGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.42% annualized return.

FGTAX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 29.47%
• 3Y*: 24.80%
• 5Y*: 15.61%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

EILGX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -11.08%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: -7.27%
• 3Y*: 7.82%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A	9.23%	26.58%	25.62%	26.18%	-9.26%	25.98%	12.59%	30.74%	-7.68%	17.54%
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	-11.08%	10.85%	10.63%	25.66%	-20.27%	30.41%	27.18%	38.37%	8.31%	27.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTAX and EILGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2008	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FGTAX and EILGX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGTAX vs. EILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTAX

FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EILGX

EILGX Risk / Return Rank: 1
EILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGTAX	EILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	-0.58	+3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	-0.73	+4.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	0.92	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	-0.47	+3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.90	-1.13	+16.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the EILGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTAX and EILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGTAX	EILGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	-0.58	+3.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.32	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.75	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.44	+0.14

Drawdowns

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTAX drawdown since its inception was -53.07%, roughly equal to the maximum EILGX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTAX and EILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGTAX	EILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.07%	-51.01%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-14.90%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.52%	-14.90%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.48%	-27.35%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	-30.85%	-4.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-13.04%	+11.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-7.12%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	6.26%	-4.26%

Volatility

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) is 2.87%, while Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that FGTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGTAX	EILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.87%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	9.52%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.01%	12.24%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.69%	16.73%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	17.91%	+0.20%

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EILGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGTAX vs. EILGX - Dividend Comparison

FGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than EILGX's 17.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	17.31%	15.39%	4.34%	0.57%	0.32%	2.18%	0.62%	0.17%	19.72%	54.05%	17.75%	23.15%
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A	3.41%	3.72%	2.48%	1.86%	4.17%	4.61%	7.84%	12.91%	21.65%	16.21%	1.75%	3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGTAX and EILGX in my portfolio?

FGTAX and EILGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGTAX or EILGX?

EILGX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to FGTAX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTAX dropped -53.07% vs EILGX's -51.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.