FGTAX vs. EILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX).
FGTAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 5, 2008. EILGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | -5.15% | 26.58% | 25.62% | 26.18% | -9.26% | 25.98% | 12.59% | 30.74% | -7.68% | 17.54% |
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -11.94% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGTAX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly higher than EILGX's -11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTAX has outperformed EILGX with an annualized return of 14.76%, while EILGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.40% annualized return.
FGTAX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
EILGX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -2.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGTAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EILGX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGTAX vs. EILGX — Risk / Return Rank
FGTAX
EILGX
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGTAX | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | -0.11 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | -0.04 | +1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.00 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | -0.25 | +1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | -0.85 | +8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGTAX | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -0.11 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.40 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTAX and EILGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Dividend Comparison
FGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than EILGX's 17.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A | 3.92% | 3.72% | 2.48% | 1.86% | 4.17% | 4.61% | 7.84% | 12.91% | 21.65% | 16.21% | 1.75% | 3.75% |
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.48% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
Drawdowns
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTAX drawdown since its inception was -53.07%, roughly equal to the maximum EILGX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTAX and EILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTAX | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.07% | -51.01% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -14.90% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -27.35% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -30.85% | -4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -13.88% | +4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -7.09% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.30% | -1.69% |
Volatility
FGTAX vs. EILGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGTAX | EILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.23% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 8.89% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 16.01% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 16.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 17.87% | +0.22% |