PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTTX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 16.67% return.


FDTTX

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.50%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.43%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
16.04%

FLCOX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.43%
YTD
16.67%
6M
15.94%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.09%27.28%26.68%23.86%-8.28%24.97%8.84%30.98%-9.36%16.36%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
16.67%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTTX and FLCOX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.91

The correlation between FDTTX and FLCOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTTX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTTX
FDTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FDTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTTXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.55

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

18.96

-5.18

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTTX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTTXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.00%

-38.28%

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-6.80%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-15.60%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-19.00%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.08%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-4.43%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.63%

+0.51%

Volatility

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) at 3.98%. This indicates that FDTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTTXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.98%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

8.65%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

11.27%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

14.86%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

17.63%

+1.24%

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTTX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than FLCOX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.87%10.77%9.20%4.34%5.64%5.60%4.40%7.49%16.04%5.52%2.74%5.82%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.30%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTTX and FLCOX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FLCOX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTTX dropped -58.00% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTTX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer